although I have been a busy one as well – deadlines for college are looming after half term, and although I thought I’d kept reasonably on top of things, there still seems to be a lot to do.
Wednesday’s degree session was very enjoyable, despite including an afternoon of drawing. In the morning we had a lecture on Fine Art Textiles – which started with the history of embroidery [been there, done that, wrote a tome about it] but then moved into looking at textiles in art, which was, I'm ashamed to say, pretty new to me.
The afternoon’s task was to make a mind map on the subject of ‘line’, then make 50 30-second sketches inspired by the mind map, and then ‘become obsessed’ about our favourite thumbnails and produce a more finished piece. And in the middle we’d have a tutorial … all in about 3 hours.
Mind maps – no problem, after all I used to teach mind-mapping. So, because I usually run out of space when I make a mind map, I used a piece of A3 and wrote small. But although I wrote a lot, I didn’t really get very creative – it was all a bit literal. Like straight, dotted, wiggly, parallel etc. etc. etc.
So I decided to get started on the thumbnails.
I didn’t mean to make a book – honest. I only realised it was a book when a fellow student commented on the fact that I was making one ‘as usual’. How well they know me …
What I thought I was doing, was using an idea in one of the new Beanery and Littlejohn books [‘Constructions’ at the bottom of the link– it’s good].
B&L suggest making a concertina of paper, folding it up and making a series of line drawings on it, without being able to see the others – a sort of visual Chinese whispers. B&L used architecture – but I used lines. Like straight, dotted, wiggly, parallel etc. etc. etc. [Most of the other students did line drawings, rather than just lines – perhaps because they are more confident drawers than I am.]
I found that the requirement to do 50, quickly, made me use different media, and get more and more inventive about what a ‘line’ was – lines of dots, weaving, wrapping, slashes in the paper. I did do some ‘proper’ drawings too – of my mug which was sitting in front of me – but using two different pens held together, or with my eyes closed, as well as the conventional way.
The resolved piece was more difficult – done in a bit of a rush at the end and, I realised, on too big a scale. What worked for the thumbnails didn’t work at 8 times the size.
Yesterday I made the concertinas into a book – although they are doing their best to escape.
Funny how you don’t realise your lettering is wonky till you look at a photo.
I also did some more work on the unresolved piece - which went so well that it is now in the bin.
This is the second try. I bet you’re surprised that it’s another book. Same size, different format.
As instructed, I became obsessed.
After all that we had an enjoyable trip to the Watermill with Mr and Mrs C to see ‘Heroes’, which was very funny and a bit sad, and just what I needed in the middle of a stressful week.
Oh – and the tutorial? It was better than expected. I was told my drawing needed to get freer, and some useful suggestions were made.
The drawings by Babybel which I had included were admired just a little bit more than her granny’s efforts, though. Quite right too.
Celia,
ReplyDeleteI like the lines made by the escaping book in the top photo.
As you had not yet implied the direction your line explorations had taken, at first I thought it was done on purpose to reflect zigzag lines etc.
Good luck. I am glad you are documenting the course. I had been thinking about doing it, but now I am not so sure. :)
Sandy in Bracknell